Wednesday, July 28, 2004

What is a Biblical Worldview?

What's a worldview anyway, and why is it important?

Click here to take a free PEERS worldview test from Nehemiah Institute.

The PEERS test consists of a series of statements carefully structured to identify a person's worldview in five categories: Politics, Economics, Education, Religion, and Social Issues (PEERS). Each statement is framed to either agree or disagree with a biblical principle.

Can We Be Good Without God?

Believing in Hell Has Its Benefits

Wednesday, July 21, 2004

What is a "Moderate?"

"If liberals engaged in cannibalism and conservatives denounced cannibalism as sin and abomination, a moderate would be someone who ate only selected people on limited occasions." :)

- William F. Buckley, Jr.

Saturday, July 17, 2004

Terror in the Skies, Again?

Interesting (kinda chilling) article about current airline terrorist activities...
Terror in the Skies, Again? - WallStreet

CitizenLink - Features - Real Data on Gay Myths

Tuesday, July 13, 2004


He looks like a little Marine. Posted by Hello

Monday, July 12, 2004

"We're used to communist propaganda like this."

Yahoo! News - Notable Quotes: "'We were used to such messages in the communist days. Everybody has open eyes and can understand that this is propaganda. It was a weak film that tells us nothing new.'
-- VACLAV KLAUS, president of the Czech Republic, after watching the MICHAEL MOORE schlockumentary 'Fahrenheit 9/11.' "

Wednesday, July 07, 2004

"Hate Crimes" Wake-up Call!

Today from Gary Bauer's "End of Day:"

Men and women of faith need to take a close look at what is going on in the world beyond our borders - there are storm clouds rising on the horizon that threaten our religious liberty here at home. In Sweden there has been a raging court battle over religious freedom and free speech that has finally come to a chilling end. Pastor Ake Green has been sentenced to one month in prison for preaching the biblical view of human sexuality. Yes, my friends, that's jail time for a pastor who dared to speak against homosexuality. And don't think this is just one isolated incident.

Last year the Anglican Bishop of Chester, England, was hauled into the local police station and investigated for hate speech after noting that some homosexuals can overcome their "orientation." Cardinals in Belgium and Spain are facing lawsuits for preaching against sexual immorality. Even in Ireland Catholic clergy have been warned against distributing the Vatican's statement against same-sex "marriage" or else they could face prosecution under Ireland's "incitement to hatred" legislation. In April, Canada passed a new "hate crimes" law that also criminalizes certain speech deemed "politically incorrect."

How does this impact us here in America? Our own Supreme Court has come to rely upon foreign law with increasing frequency. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor recently cited foreign law in determining the outcome in cases related to the death penalty and overturning laws against homosexual sodomy. But it's not just the courts. Last month 65 members of the United States Senate voted for a bill elevating sexual preferences to the same legal status as one's race and religion. How much longer before priests, pastors and rabbis are hauled off to prison cells in this country for defending our Judeo-Christian values?

Sunday, July 04, 2004

A Right to... Liberty

I've been pondering the Declaration, on this our nation's birthday, and have done so, in a different matter, I think than before.

It seems as Americans that we gloss over the words--assuming that they're history, blah blah blah. I've spoken on the "in-a-lien-able" nature of these God-given rights before, but this morning I started think about them individually.

The founders wrote that some Truths are self-evident. That "ALL men" (of course this refers to all people) "are endowed by their (our) Creator with certain unalienable rights" and that "among these" are "Life. Liberty. The pursuit of happiness."

Ok, so let's break it down. By writing that these are self-evident, that means that no one has to explain it. It's just the way it is.

God, the Creator, the ultimate Law Giver and Supreme Judge (arbiter) of the World granted these rights before time existed--before Man ever had the light mist of a brainstorm start to form in his mind about what a law should or shouldn't be!

They are self-evident. All men are created by God, equal. The Bible in fact, goes so far as to say that we're "made in His image."

Life, Liberty, Pursuit of Happiness. Note that Jefferson wrote "among these." --From this, he was inferring that God has given us other inalienable rights. Things that our Constitution can't guarantee us. Things that no document can create or take away.

Liberals, Conservatives, and "Moderates" ought to agree to this: what government gives, government may take away. I'd think that it would be much better to depend upon the inalienable rights from God, rather than even the venerable First Amendment to the Constitution!

But if God doesn't exist, or isn't supposed to be involved in our national experiment, who/what does that leave as the ultimate "end" for these rights?

That's a worthy subject, and one I could delve into, but let's consider the Right to Liberty.

What got me to think was how often that inalienable right to liberty clashes with oppression by men. I believe in the Rule of Law, as long as Law is upholding Right, rather than lawlessness.

This is the principle upon which our Founders swore "their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor." Do you know what the penalty for high treason was? Click here. They literally signed that document with their own blood!

So, this brings me in a roundabout way to my point. I am considering what seems to be a discrepency between the God-given right to liberty and preventing illegal aliens from entering our nation's borders. Aren't they just seeking their right to liberty?

What does liberty mean? In the purest sense of the word, it means "freedom from physical restraint." The freedom to move around without someone/something unnaturally restricting you.

How is it that the two may meet?

The answer is in Who the liberty is sought from. the inalienable right to liberty can only come from God. If it is granted by the United States, then it's not inalienable. Our country cannot be the deistic grantor of liberties.

There are several verses that bear this out:

Consider 2 Cor 3:17. Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty.

Our Founders knew this and this passage works it even more thoroughly:
(Paul, speaking of the liberty to eat certain things)
1 Cor 8:9-12 But take care that this liberty of yours does not somehow become a stumbling block to the weak. For if someone sees you, who have knowledge, dining in an idol's temple, will not his conscience, if he is weak, be strengthened to eat things sacrificed to idols? For through your knowledge he who is weak is ruined, the brother for whose sake Christ died. And so, by sinning against the brethren and wounding their conscience when it is weak, you sin against Christ.

America was founded by men and women who understood the limitations of the freedom of liberty. Lest we forget, our second president wrote that our government was created for "a religious and moral people. It is wholly unsuited for any other."

The limitation is this: We must recognize that liberty comes from God, not man.

And not only us, but those who desire that liberty/freedom. They cannot seek it from other men--we cannot "give" it to Iraq any more than we can "give" it to illegal aliens stealing into the country under cover of night.

Our charge is preserving liberty and protecting it. Recognizing that it comes from God is the start. After all, our nation's symbol of liberty--the Liberty Bell--bears the inscription:

"Proclaim Liberty Throughout the Land!" - Leviticus 25:10

The liberty that we cherish on this 228th birthday of our nation comes from God. If we forget that as a nation, could we be the ones crawling under the borders of the nation that remembers the Hand of the One Who made liberty?

Consider 2 Chronicles 7:14

Inalienable. adj. /in-ah-lee-nah-bul/

Def. - incapable of being alienated, surrendered, or transferred, i.e., You can't place a lien against it. It's impossible. These rights come from our Creator.

When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one People to dissolve the Political Bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the Separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness -- That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

The Unanimous Declaration of Independence. July 4, 1776

Saturday, July 03, 2004

How True!

Friday, July 02, 2004

Swedish Pastor Jailed For Preaching Against Homosexuality

It has happened -- a pastor in Sweden, speaking from the
pulpit the truth about homosexuality, is going to jail,
Ecumenical News International reported.

Under a law against incitement, Pastor Ake Green, a member
of the Pentecostal movement, was sentenced to a month in
prison for describing homosexuality as "abnormal -- a
horrible cancerous tumor in the body of society" in a
sermon. His words offended some homosexuals.

Soren Andersson, the president of the Swedish federation
for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender rights believes
that religious freedom should not be used "as a reason to
offend people" and agrees with the sentence.

As one who heard the reports said, "I guess that shows the
true face of gay tolerance -- (which is) intolerance."

Source: CitizenLink.org

Who exactly DO we answer to?

Why are our U.S. Congressmen asking the UN to "ensure free and fair
elections in America?"

I'm amazed at the audacity of some of these lawmakers.

US lawmakers request UN observers for November 2 presidential election

Three Secular Reasons Why America Should be Under God